[Teofelia]

Det er ganske mange glimrende bøker som høres ut som kiosklitteratur når man oppsummerer handlingen altså.

Greven av Monte Cristo
In the ultimate revenge fantasy, Edmond Dantes gets tossed in prison for life on the eve of his wedding after being falsely accused of being a Bonapartist (dudes were jealous of his success and his babe of a fiance), but he manages to escape by slipping into a sack containing a dead prisoner, which is tossed into the ocean — whereupon Dantes escapes and is rescued by some smugglers who take him to the island of Monte Cristo, where he finds buried treasure, which he uses to psychologically, financially and physically destroy the three men who got him in the can in the first place, then ride off into the sunset with his new main chick, Haydee.

Forbrytelse og straff
A super broke college dropout becomes convinced that the universe is telling him to kill a pawnbroker because that’s what great men do — which he does, but eventually confesses to at the urging of an extremely Christian prostitute.

Gullivers reiser

Just your typical story about an erstwhile surgeon who takes to the sea and is either attacked by pirates or shipwrecked on every excursion, stumbling upon islands of miniature people, islands of giants and flying islands, an island that pretty much only houses magicians and also Japan (because why not?) before finally settling down on an island governed by highly intelligent horses.

http://airshipdaily.com/blog/1209201...s-one-sentence

Når det er sagt: hvis man velger å innvolvere internett i planleggingen og utformingen av boken sin, må man enten lukke ørene for kritikken og synspunktene som er dømt til å komme, ellers må man ta både de positive og de kritisk innspillene med godt humør. Å bruke krefter på å prøve å overbevise kritikere til sitt syn, eller bruke energi på å ta seg nær av innspill, har neppe noe for seg og vil gjøre prosessen unødig smertefull, tenker jeg.